![]() The script is hilariously cheesy, the editing is choppy and you'd be hard pressed to find a likable character in this movie. And to make things worse, the crocs aren't well-utilised, their scenes are lacking in suspense and they are not menacing in the slightest. However, the crocodile effects are the worst of the three, among the cheapest of any group of special effects I've seen in a while. However, at least unlike the second, which was like a vastly inferior carbon copy, there is an attempt to be more original, and in terms of acting while not on the levels of Brendan Gleeson and the like from the original there is a good performance from Michael Ironside, whereas the two big names of the second film(Leachman and John Schneider) were literally wasted. Neither are great here, the story is formulaic and doesn't have that many scares and the acting is amateurish from the lesser-known names. The two main improvements were the acting and story. But surprisingly, while nowhere near as good as the original, it does improve, if not by much, on the second. So considering it was SyFy, I was expecting to hate this one more. I hated the second film though mainly because of the waste of Cloris Leachman. It wasn't the best film I've seen, but it had a good atmosphere, had good acting and a witty script. Reviewed by TheLittleSongbird 4 / 10 Better than the second film, but nowhere near as good as the first
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |